Axe DevTools Pro ACT Implementation
| Consistent | Partially consistent | |
|---|---|---|
| WCAG 2 rules | 29 | 0 | 
| Proposed rules | 6 | 12 | 
Implemented Rules
About Axe DevTools Pro Results
Axe DevTools Pro combines the automated results of axe-core, and results from
axe Intelligent Guided Test (IGT) tools. Tools can produced multiple issue types.
The ID of each issue type is given as the name of the procedure, with the tool 
that returns it in brackets. For example alt-text-not-meaningful (Images) is 
the alt-text-not-meaningful issue type reported by the Images tool.
Results in this page are taken from a public test report published by Deque Systems. Data is published using the EARL+JSON-LD data format.
Implementation Details
Role attribute has valid value
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  aria-roles procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Role attribute has valid value
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 10 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | 
        
          
  | 
    
| aria-roles | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
ARIA state or property has valid value
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  aria-valid-attr-value procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  ARIA state or property has valid value
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers 20 of the 21 examples.
    On 1 example
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | 
        
          
  | 
    
| aria-valid-attr-value | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | 
| Passed Example 10 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Failed Example 7 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
ARIA attribute is defined in WAI-ARIA
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  aria-valid-attr procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  ARIA attribute is defined in WAI-ARIA
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 7 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | 
        
          
  | 
    
| aria-valid-attr | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Element with lang attribute has valid language tag
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  valid-lang procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Element with lang attribute has valid language tag
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 19 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| valid-lang | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | passed, failed | 
| Failed Example 7 | failed | 
| Failed Example 8 | failed | 
| Failed Example 9 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | passed | 
Menuitem has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  button-name procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Menuitem has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 8 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| button-name | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
autocomplete attribute has valid value
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  autocomplete-valid procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  autocomplete attribute has valid value
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 28 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| autocomplete-valid | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | passed | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Failed Example 7 | failed | 
| Failed Example 8 | failed | 
| Failed Example 9 | failed | 
| Failed Example 10 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 9 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 * | untested | 
| Inapplicable Example 9 * | untested | 
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Button has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  button-name, and aria-command-name procedures.
    Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Button has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 17 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| button-name | aria-command-name | |
|---|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 4 | inapplicable | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 7 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 3 | inapplicable | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | passed | inapplicable | 
Element marked as decorative is not exposed
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  presentation-role-conflict procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Element marked as decorative is not exposed
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 10 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| presentation-role-conflict | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Form field has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  label, aria-input-field-name, and select-name procedures.
    Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Form field has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 19 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| label | aria-input-field-name | select-name | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 3 | inapplicable | inapplicable | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 6 | inapplicable | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 7 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 4 | inapplicable | inapplicable | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | inapplicable | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 6 | inapplicable | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 7 | inapplicable | failed | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | inapplicable | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 8 | failed | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 8 * | untested | untested | untested | 
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
HTML page lang attribute has valid language tag
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  html-lang-valid procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  HTML page lang attribute has valid language tag
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 7 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| html-lang-valid | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
HTML page has non-empty title
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  document-title procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  HTML page has non-empty title
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 11 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| document-title | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Image button has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  input-image-alt procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Image button has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 12 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| input-image-alt | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
Image has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  image-alt, and role-img-alt procedures.
    Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Image has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 18 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| image-alt | role-img-alt | |
|---|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 2 | inapplicable | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | inapplicable | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 2 | inapplicable | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
Link has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  link-name, and area-alt procedures.
    Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Link has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 28 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| link-name | area-alt | |
|---|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 3 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 10 | inapplicable | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 7 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 8 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 9 | inapplicable | failed | 
| Failed Example 10 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 11 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 11 | failed | inapplicable | 
SVG element with explicit role has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  svg-img-alt procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  SVG element with explicit role has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 10 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| svg-img-alt | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
Element with presentational children has no focusable content
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  nested-interactive procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Element with presentational children has no focusable content
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 7 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| nested-interactive | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | passed, failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | passed, failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Headers attribute specified on a cell refers to cells in the same table element
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  td-headers-attr procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Headers attribute specified on a cell refers to cells in the same table element
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 17 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| td-headers-attr | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | passed, failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 * | inapplicable | 
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Element with aria-hidden has no content in sequential focus navigation
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  aria-hidden-focus procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Element with aria-hidden has no content in sequential focus navigation
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers 13 of the 15 examples.
    On 2 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| aria-hidden-focus | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
Meta element has no refresh delay
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  meta-refresh procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Meta element has no refresh delay
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 15 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| meta-refresh | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | passed, failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | passed | 
Meta viewport allows for zoom
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  meta-viewport procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Meta viewport allows for zoom
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 11 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| meta-viewport | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 * | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 * | passed | 
| Failed Example 2 * | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 * | passed | 
| Failed Example 7 * | passed | 
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Object element rendering non-text content has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  object-alt procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Object element rendering non-text content has non-empty accessible name
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 18 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| object-alt | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable | 
HTML page has lang attribute
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  html-has-lang procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  HTML page has lang attribute
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 7 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| html-has-lang | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
HTML page title is descriptive
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  title-not-meaningful (structure) procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  HTML page title is descriptive
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers 6 of the 7 examples.
    On 1 example
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| title-not-meaningful (structure) | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | cannot tell | 
Image accessible name is descriptive
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  alt-text-short-text-not-meaningful (Images) procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Image accessible name is descriptive
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 16 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| alt-text-short-text-not-meaningful (Images) | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 9 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 10 | passed | 
Scrollable content can be reached with sequential focus navigation
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  scrollable-region-focusable procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Scrollable content can be reached with sequential focus navigation
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 10 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| scrollable-region-focusable | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 2 * | untested | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 * | untested | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 * | untested | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 * | untested | 
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Element in sequential focus order has visible focus
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  focus-indicator-missing (keyboard) procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Element in sequential focus order has visible focus
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 7 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| focus-indicator-missing (keyboard) | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 4 * | untested | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 * | untested | 
*: These examples are not yet approved for the rule. Results on these outcomes are not taken into consideration determining the consistency and coverage.
Text has minimum contrast
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  color-contrast procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Text has minimum contrast
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers 25 of the 32 examples.
    On 7 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| color-contrast | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | 
| Passed Example 10 | passed | 
| Passed Example 11 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Failed Example 7 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 8 | passed, failed | 
| Failed Example 9 | failed | 
| Failed Example 10 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 9 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 10 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 11 | inapplicable | 
Text has enhanced contrast
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  color-contrast-enhanced, and color-contrast procedures.
    Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Text has enhanced contrast
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers 27 of the 34 examples.
    On 7 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| color-contrast-enhanced | color-contrast | |
|---|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 10 | passed | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | passed | 
| Failed Example 2 | passed | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | passed | 
| Failed Example 4 | passed | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | passed | 
| Failed Example 6 | passed | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 7 | failed | passed | 
| Failed Example 8 | failed | passed | 
| Failed Example 9 | failed | passed | 
| Failed Example 10 | passed | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 11 | passed, failed | passed | 
| Failed Example 12 | failed | passed | 
| Failed Example 13 | failed | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | passed | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | passed | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 9 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 10 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 11 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
Meta element has no refresh delay (no exception)
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  meta-refresh-no-exceptions, and meta-refresh procedures.
    Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Meta element has no refresh delay (no exception)
  WCAG 2 rule. 
    It covers all 13 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| meta-refresh-no-exceptions | meta-refresh | |
|---|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | passed | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | passed | 
| Failed Example 3 | passed, failed | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | passed | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | passed | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | passed | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | passed | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | passed | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | passed | passed | 
ARIA required context role
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  aria-required-parent, and aria-required-children procedures.
    Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  ARIA required context role
   proposed rule.
    It covers 14 of the 15 examples.
    On 1 example
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| aria-required-parent | aria-required-children | |
|---|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | passed | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | passed | inapplicable | 
ARIA required owned elements
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  aria-required-children procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  ARIA required owned elements
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 17 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| aria-required-children | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | passed, failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Failed Example 7 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | passed | 
ARIA state or property is permitted
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  aria-allowed-attr, and aria-prohibited-attr procedures.
    Failed examples should be failed by at least one of these procedures.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  ARIA state or property is permitted
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 16 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | 
        
          
  | 
    
| aria-allowed-attr | aria-prohibited-attr | |
|---|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 10 | passed | passed | 
| Passed Example 11 | passed | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | passed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | passed | 
| Failed Example 3 | passed | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | inapplicable | 
Block of repeated content is collapsible
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  bypass procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Block of repeated content is collapsible
   proposed rule.
    It covers 1 of the 8 examples.
    On 7 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | 
        
          
  | 
    
| bypass | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Bypass Blocks of Repeated Content
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  bypass procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Bypass Blocks of Repeated Content
   proposed rule.
    It covers 9 of the 14 examples.
    On 5 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| bypass | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 8 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | 
| Passed Example 10 | passed | 
| Passed Example 11 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 12 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Document has heading for non-repeated content
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  bypass procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Document has heading for non-repeated content
   proposed rule.
    It covers 10 of the 14 examples.
    On 2 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | 
        
          
  | 
    
| bypass | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Passed Example 9 | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | passed | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 4 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  bypass procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Document has an instrument to move focus to non-repeated content
   proposed rule.
    It covers 8 of the 12 examples.
    On 2 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | 
        
          
  | 
    
| bypass | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Passed Example 7 | passed | 
| Passed Example 8 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | passed | 
| Failed Example 3 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Document has a landmark with non-repeated content
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  bypass procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Document has a landmark with non-repeated content
   proposed rule.
    It covers 5 of the 8 examples.
    On 3 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | 
        
          
  | 
    
| bypass | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Form field label is descriptive
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  label-visible-not-descriptive (forms) procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Form field label is descriptive
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 14 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| label-visible-not-descriptive (forms) | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
Heading has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  empty-heading procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Heading has non-empty accessible name
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 15 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports no success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | None | 
| empty-heading | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | failed | 
| Failed Example 7 | failed | 
| Failed Example 8 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
Iframe elements with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  frame-title-unique procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Iframe elements with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
   proposed rule.
    It covers 11 of the 23 examples.
    On 10 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| frame-title-unique | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 5 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 6 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 7 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 8 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 9 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 10 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Failed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 9 | inapplicable | 
Iframe element has non-empty accessible name
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  frame-title procedure.
  The implementation is 
    fully  consistent with the
  Iframe element has non-empty accessible name
   proposed rule.
    It covers all 11 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| frame-title | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | passed | 
Image not in the accessibility tree is decorative
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  alt-text-missing + semantic-hidden (images) procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Image not in the accessibility tree is decorative
   proposed rule.
    It covers 17 of the 20 examples.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| alt-text-missing + semantic-hidden (images) | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 4 | passed | 
| Failed Example 5 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 8 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 9 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 10 | inapplicable | 
Error message describes invalid form field value
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  form-error-required-unclear + instructions-not-included (forms) procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Error message describes invalid form field value
   proposed rule.
    It covers 7 of the 9 examples.
  
    For 1 example
    no results were reported. This can happen when examples are newer then the
    test results.
  
  
    The implementation reports different success criteria as failed from what is expected by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| form-error-required-unclear + instructions-not-included (forms) | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | untested | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | passed | 
| Failed Example 5 | failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
Links with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  identical-links-same-purpose procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Links with identical accessible names have equivalent purpose
   proposed rule.
    It covers 10 of the 21 examples.
    On 11 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| identical-links-same-purpose | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 7 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 8 | cannot tell | 
| Passed Example 9 | passed | 
| Passed Example 10 | passed | 
| Passed Example 11 | passed | 
| Passed Example 12 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 4 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 5 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 6 | cannot tell | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
Element with role attribute has required states and properties
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  aria-required-attr procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Element with role attribute has required states and properties
   proposed rule.
    It covers 14 of the 15 examples.
  
    For 1 example
    no results were reported. This can happen when examples are newer then the
    test results.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
| None | 
        
          
  | 
    
| aria-required-attr | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | untested | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | failed | 
| Failed Example 5 | passed, failed | 
| Failed Example 6 | passed, failed | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
Table header cell has assigned cells
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  th-has-data-cells procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Table header cell has assigned cells
   proposed rule.
    It covers 13 of the 16 examples.
    On 2 examples
    the implementation cannot tell the outcome. This is often because of technical 
    limitations in tools.
  
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| th-has-data-cells | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | passed | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 2 | cannot tell | 
| Failed Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 5 | passed | 
| Inapplicable Example 6 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 7 | inapplicable | 
Visible label is part of accessible name
  This rule is implemented by Axe DevTools Pro using the
  label-content-name-mismatch procedure.
  The implementation is  partially 
   consistent with the
  Visible label is part of accessible name
   proposed rule.
    It covers 12 of the 15 examples.
  
    For 3 examples
    no results were reported. This can happen when examples are newer then the
    test results.
  
  
    The implementation correctly reports which success criteria are failed by this rule.
  
  See understanding ACT consistency.
| Expected | Reported | 
|---|---|
        
          
  | 
      
        
          
  | 
    
| label-content-name-mismatch | |
|---|---|
| Passed Example 1 | passed | 
| Passed Example 2 | passed | 
| Passed Example 3 | passed | 
| Passed Example 4 | passed | 
| Passed Example 5 | untested | 
| Passed Example 6 | passed | 
| Failed Example 1 | failed | 
| Failed Example 2 | failed | 
| Failed Example 3 | failed | 
| Failed Example 4 | untested | 
| Failed Example 5 | untested | 
| Inapplicable Example 1 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 2 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 3 | inapplicable | 
| Inapplicable Example 4 | inapplicable |